Welcome to my second blog post!
Did you hear about the potential Starbucks/Chipotle merger? People are either raving at this idea, or shaking their heads. After reading multiple articles about it, there's a low chance of it actually happening, but it definitely makes me question both companies financial situations, and if that could be the driving force of this idea... But hey, breakfast burritos and a pumpkin spice latte sounds pretty enticing.
I found this article by searching for "Starbucks News" on google. I stopped drinking Starbucks about 6 months ago when the quality of their drinks decreased too much to justify the rising prices. That is truly saying a lot about the quality because I used to be a diehard Starbucks fan. Additionally, I started feeling sick every time I drank or ate anything from their stores. I'm not the only one, many of my friends and family had the same experiences. So of course, I was intrigued by the news of a potential merger, especially when this one makes absolutely no sense to consumers.
In my opinion, Starbucks is overpriced and they have too many drink options that clearly employees cannot keep up with. Similar to what we've discussed in class, consumers have too many choices and not enough time.
Article Links:
https://www.ft.com/content/79cef26a-e5e9-41d0-9af2-876dc23a9a7d?syn-25a6b1a6=1
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/starbucks-responds-chipotle-merger-report-rcna602388
Starbucks lost what made them special.
As it turns out, Starbucks was taken over by CEO Brian Nicol in 2024, and to my surprise, he has been working on the "Back to Starbucks" movement since coming into this position. He previously was the CEO for Chipotle before taking over Starbucks. This "Back to Starbucks" movement is designed to bring Starbucks back to it's roots (Value proposition). Brian claimed, "This includes restoring a warm and welcoming atmosphere, delivering great customer service, creating countless moments of human connection, and delivering high quality beverages and food customers crave." To be honest, this was news to me, but after doing research I can see where Nicol has been taking action to follow through on this claim. Starbucks has closed over 250 locations in the past month to improve quality control. They also have been requiring employees to write messages on the cups for customers, have brought back refillable ceramic mugs, and have invested in more staff. Nicol also claims they are trying to bring customers back to the center.
All of this makes me and likely investors question, what is the motive behind merging with this 39 billion dollar burrito company? The first article written by the Financial Times looks into this decision. It is only a hypothetical for now, but if it were to happen, it could be one of the biggest mergers in restaurant history. The article also mentions how this merger would be a huge task to take on, and is very complex considering how large both companies are.
Starbucks' Original Value Proposition
Starbucks was founded in 1971 based on warmth and artistry of Italian coffee culture. Their mission has always been to put customers first, brighten people's day with good quality coffee, and build costumer intimacy. It has never just been about coffee for this company, it's been about creating a quality, consistent experience that everybody can enjoy.
So could this Starbucks and Chipotle merger actually happen?
Currently, there is talk of Starbucks proposing the idea to financial advisers, but Chipotle has made no comment on their position, and Starbucks has also not confirmed this speculation by the Financial Times.
Starbucks has been focusing on their "Back to Starbucks" mission with an S&P 500 13% return this year alone. Meanwhile, Chipotle's shares have dropped more than 11% this year. The Financial Times reported, "Shares in Starbucks tumbled as much as 6.7 percent following the FT report on Thursday, later paring losses to close 0.4 percent lower. Chipotle shares jumped 6.2 percent."
Starbucks has claimed that they will continue staying laser focused on their turnaround strategies, as it has already been successful, and that they will not be commenting on these rumors.
To me, it doesn't make sense for Starbucks to be proposing this idea with their current strategy in place, but does it make sense for Chipotle? Considering Brian Nicol was the CEO for 6 years there, it may have something to do with bringing that company back from their dips in revenue this past year. Chipotle's current CEO claims to also be focused on revitalizing their rewards programs and bringing customers back with new menu items, but they do not have as big of a mission as Starbucks does currently. So this merger could make Chipotle more relevant again.
It appears this potential proposal is not coming out of left field. Mcdermott Law states, "The second Trump administration employs a lighter-touch antitrust approach that shifts enforcement toward traditional economics and open negotiations, significantly easing the path for corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A)." The Financial Times is speculating that this merger could be influenced by this anti-trust regulation. Corporate America is looking for ways to take advantage of this, including Starbucks and Chipotle. Ultimately, it all comes down to money.
Another possible reason for this decision is how successful restaurant mergers have proven to be in the past. For example, Burger King merged with Tim Hortons, making them worth 11.4 billion. Additionally, Dunkin Donuts and Baskin-Robbins merged for 11.3 billion. Could it work for Chipotle and Starbucks?
How could this benefit consumers? Who would it be targeted to?
However, after searching on Instagram, I am seeing comments such as, "Coffee and Chipotle = perfect combo for the toilet run 🚽" and "Starbucks has a lot of improvement to do before thinking of mergers … let’s start with serving organic and sustainable coffee." and "Great now the prices are gonna be even higher." I don't think anybody is super enticed by this idea.
So, is this a good idea?
Ultimately, I think no. These companies seem to both be focusing on the money and not their customers. That is, if this proposal is even legit. But if it is, I do not think there is any logic behind it other than taking advantage of the light touch anti-trust regulation, and the publicity it could get. I don't think there is enough common ground between the two company's to justify this decision. Besides the fact that both are in serious trouble if they don't turn things around. I can also see it from the other perspective, this could help both companies work on turnaround strategies as a team, but for consumers it would be pretty confusing. Who would realistically be their target market?
It is clear that both companies are losing sight of their original value propositions. In a day and age where consumers are overwhelmed with too many choices, it seems more important than ever that companies focus on what makes them UNIQUE. Nobody has a true niche anymore, and that is where I think companies are going wrong. Customers don't always make decisions about simply the product they are buying, but how the business makes them feel, as we have read in "The New Rules of Marketing & PR" by David Meerman Scott. That's why I really hope Starbucks continues to focus on bringing back their warm, inviting atmosphere and quality coffee vs. making stupid decisions based on money and stocks.
This decision also makes investors question if Starbucks is truly confident in their "Back to Starbucks" mission. If they are actually proposing such a risky idea with how successful their current strategies are going, what is the motive? It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I believe it is very unlikely that we will see this move past just a silly proposition, especially with how people have already reacted and how Starbucks ' stocks have dropped practically overnight.
Overall, I think this idea would be detrimental to both companies, but especially Starbucks. They need to actually listen to what people are saying about their prices, quality, and customer service, and not get distracted big big business deals. We just want the old Starbucks back. That would certainly bring me back as a loyal customer.
What would I do as the brand manager?
I would definitely be interacting more with customers on social media. Similarly to how American Airlines connects with people and answers questions live time online, Starbucks needs to be doing the same thing. Because as you saw by some of the reactions to this proposed merger, people are sick and tired of overpriced drinks and changes in quality. Starbucks needs to be building back relationships with consumers vs. solely focusing on what will make them more money.
What did I learn from doing this assignment?
I learned that there is so much going on in the corporate world, and that everything always comes back to, how can we become the biggest and greatest company in the world? But so many are missing the point and not listening to consumers. There needs to be a massive shift in marketing, business strategy, and quality control in the restaurant industry.
I also learned a lot about Starbucks that I did not know, it was super interesting as I used to be one of their loyal, daily customers. I was pleasantly surprised to discover they have been at least trying a bit to shift back to their roots and fix what is broken.
Thanks for tuning in, I will surely be back with more interesting marketing content soon!
No comments:
Post a Comment